Bag of Bones
Damn. As a fan of Stephen King, I wanted to like this film/mini series. A lot. But when I lost count of the number of horror clichés used in the first 15 minutes, I resigned with a heavy heart that this was going to be a long, hard haul. In fact, I only stuck through it because it was Stephen King. Had it been anything else, I would have turned it off. What clichés you ask? A few (and there are many) come to mind: The bus out of nowhere with a driver that is blind only to pedestrians; dreams within dreams within dreams, some four or five levels deep (no, not interesting the Inception kind); startling us instead of building suspense and really scaring us (there is a huge difference in both effort and payoff); inanimate objects that suddenly come to life just when the story needs them to; animals leaping out of dark places. It’s so depressingly easy to list them I have to stop. It seems the viewing audience has become accustomed to these clichés as being scary. It’s a trend that has to stop. Don’t be fooled by the IMDb rating of 9.9 stars as that is clearly bogus. 40% of those rating the film gave it a perfect 10. Wow. If you need any other convincing, read the IMDb viewer reviews instead for a more accurate rating which averages out to about 3.9 stars (from 14 reviews at time of writing).



December 12, 2011 






Absolutely must see!
Go out of your way to see this!
Would gladly pay to see this.
You will be entertained.
Average Hollywood effort.
2 hours you'll never get back.
Absolutely don't waste your time.